On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 8:15:49 AM, Chris Santerre wrote: > The idea [of a whitelist DNS list] would cause more lookups and > time for those who don't cache dns.
That's another excellent argument. Barring caching, which not all resolvers do, why do a gazillion DNS lookups on yahoo.com, w3.org, etc. when we already know they're whitehats? Hard coding small, local exclusion lists into uridnsbl_skip_domain and whitelist_spamcop_uri is probably a better solution. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
