From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > At 11:55 PM 12/13/2004 -0500, Peter Matulis wrote: > ie: jdow wrote: > > The chief thing SPF does is clutter up name server traffic to prove > > something of little or no use when scoring spam. > > A true argument, but utterly missing the point, unfortunately. >
I'm not advocating getting rid of it now. I am advocating using it with full knowledge of what happens when it doesn't do what it should for idiot anti-spam reasons. The law of unintended consequences stomps you on the foot too often. This is a heavy triphammer.
That's a good point. You definitely should proceed with caution. But that doesn't
