On Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 4:52:53 PM, mouss mouss wrote: > Jeff Chan wrote: >> On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 8:22:24 AM, Matthew Romanek wrote: >> >>>FYI (and for future list-searchers), the problem with URIDNSBL >>>appearing to work but not actually scoring was because the host's >>>resolv.conf included 127.0.0.1, which apparently something doesn't >>>like.
> use 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1, or better, an IP of one of the > physical interfaces. there seems to be a bug with sock_dgram code. Matthew Was the OS Fedora Core 1 for this bug? Mouss, If there's a bug would you please submit it to them? Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
