On Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 10:27:21 PM, Matthew Romanek wrote: > On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:34:44 -0800, Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 4:52:53 PM, mouss mouss wrote: >> > Jeff Chan wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 8:22:24 AM, Matthew Romanek wrote: >> >> >> >>>FYI (and for future list-searchers), the problem with URIDNSBL >> >>>appearing to work but not actually scoring was because the host's >> >>>resolv.conf included 127.0.0.1, which apparently something doesn't >> >>>like. >> >> > use 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1, or better, an IP of one of the >> > physical interfaces. there seems to be a bug with sock_dgram code. >> >> Matthew >> Was the OS Fedora Core 1 for this bug? >> >> Mouss, >> If there's a bug would you please submit it to them?
> Indeed it was. > However, the fix was fairly straight forward. There was an entry for > 127.0.0.1 in the /etc/resolv.conf. When that was changed to the > interface IP, everything started working again. It's been repro'd. > Something just doesn't like using the loopback interface for DNS > lookups. Thanks for the feedback Matthew. Mouss would you care to report the bug to Fedora, if you haven't already? (It sounds like it was somewhat known already?) Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
