On 2/18/2005 2:17 PM, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 02:03 PM 2/18/2005, Eric A. Hall wrote: > >>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.0/sql/README >>(which has a bad MIME-type definition, btw [text/english is not real]) >>says that SQL lookups are only used with spamd, and so presumably they are >>not used with spamassassin itself. Further poking seems to prove this >>assumption correct. >> >>Is this correct? If so, is there intent on adding this functionality? > > I'd be a bit surprised.. the plain "spamassassin" command line isn't really > well suited to high volume production use. It's more intended for very > simple setups that handle small amounts of mail.
That's not mutually exclusive, and is actually somewhat inclusive. I mean, if people are using the spamassassin script on a low-volume basis, then there's a low volume of SQL/LDAP lookups, so the complaint is nulled. >>Because of my postfix/SA setup I'm not able to use spamd very easily. > > Why not? spamc should be a more-or-less drop in replacement for calls to > spamassassin once spamd is started... I'm using a third-party script for the in-line proxy, and it daemonizes spamassassin on its own. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
