On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, Noel Butler wrote:
On 03/03/2018 04:40, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
-0.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_RDNS RBL: IADB: Sender has reverse DNS record
[199.127.240.84 listed in iadb.isipp.com]
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_SPF RBL: IADB: Sender publishes SPF record
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_OPTIN RBL: IADB: All mailing list mail is opt-in
-0.0 RCVD_IN_IADB_SENDERID RBL: IADB: Sender publishes Sender ID record
-0.0 RCVD_IN_IADB_LISTED RBL: Participates in the IADB system
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_DK RBL: IADB: Sender publishes Domain Keys record
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED RBL: ISIPP IADB lists as vouched-for sender
I am concerned when the default settings in SA effectively facilitate
marketing companies to stuff my Inbox full of junk.
-0.6 points makes the difference?
Perhaps the default scores need to be reviewed, but simply having the
rules isn't problematic.
Have to agree with him, it can make all the difference in some cases,
I'd prefer to see the rules stay, but all at score 0
-0.001 surely... 0 = disabled = breaks dependencies.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
How can you reason with someone who thinks we're on a glidepath to
a police state and yet their solution is to grant the government a
monopoly on force? They are insane.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
11 days until Albert Einstein's 139th Birthday
