On 03/03/2018 05:54 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 03/03/2018 11:40, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, Noel Butler wrote:
On 03/03/2018 04:40, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
-0.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_RDNS RBL: IADB: Sender has reverse DNS record
[199.127.240.84 listed in iadb.isipp.com]
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_SPF RBL: IADB: Sender publishes SPF record
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_OPTIN RBL: IADB: All mailing list mail is opt-in
-0.0 RCVD_IN_IADB_SENDERID RBL: IADB: Sender publishes Sender ID record
-0.0 RCVD_IN_IADB_LISTED RBL: Participates in the IADB system
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_DK RBL: IADB: Sender publishes Domain Keys record
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED RBL: ISIPP IADB lists as vouched-for sender
I am concerned when the default settings in SA effectively
facilitate marketing companies to stuff my Inbox full of junk.
-0.6 points makes the difference?
Perhaps the default scores need to be reviewed, but simply having the
rules isn't problematic.
Have to agree with him, it can make all the difference in some cases,
I'd prefer to see the rules stay, but all at score 0
If you have properly tuned SA for your mail flow and added local
rules/plugins, these default IADB scores should not cause real spam to
score under the default 5.0 threshold.
-0.001 surely... 0 = disabled = breaks dependencies.
That would be acceptable :)
--
David Jones
