Well you are welcome to send me new Spamples to look at. As I noted, I've never seen these variants and RBLs aren't hitting them which ALSO means you have some new variants.
Regards, KAM -- Kevin A. McGrail VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Andy Smith <a.sm...@ldex.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > > I'm not really getting any joy with the RBLs. I have, for example, a > sample from the 14th and, taking away my custom rule, Bayes and KAM scores, > the default score would be "0" :( > > Content here: https://pastebin.com/dthDn8yb > > > thanks, Andy. > > > On 19-06-2018 17:12, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > The warnings are OK though make sure you have the nonKAMrules.cf as well. > > I'm not seeing really any of these spamples for us and agree. It's > scoring in the 1.2 range for me. > > Clearly seems to be compromised url so RBLs are you likely bet but you > might be a patient 0 for a new engine. > -- > Kevin A. McGrail > > >
