Yes, I have changed the value of this rule long ago. It seemed to be
better. I may have to turn it down a little.
And I am the admin myself but I'm no expert in spam fighting. Especially
what the reason or source of that blacklisting is. I just see the rule
matched and I consider that wrong because stackexchange is a service I
use often and it never sent my anything unexpected.
So what is the reason for this host being listed?
-Yves
________________________________________
Von: RW
Gesendet: Sa, 2018-07-28 21:35 +0200
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 21:20:49 +0200
Yves Goergen wrote:
Hello,
I've received a notification e-mail from stackexchange.com
(stackoverflow.com) with a high spam score. It has this line in its
report:
5.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL
blacklist [URIs: stackexchange.com]
I guess that's not supposed to be like that.
The default is 1.7, 5.7 is extremely aggressive for that rule,
particular when there's no BAYES_* result in the report.
I can't change anything
at it, just for information for somebody in the position to fix that.
It's a very indirect way of getting to your local admin.
