On 9/22/2018 9:55 AM, RW wrote:
/^v=spf1 .+(\?|\+)all$/
I believe [?+] would do the same easy to read, parse and maybe even to
process (I have no idea how perl RE optimizer works)
.+ should be .* or it wont match
'v=spf1 +all'
I would remove the '$' as it doesn't appear do anything useful and could
prevent matches on weird spf records.
It may be worth splitting them into two rules for '?' and '+', there's
no dns overhead and they seem like significantly different cases.
hypotetically - masschecks should prove that.
On 22.09.18 09:57, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
# SPF THAT DOESN'T REALLY CARE IF EMAIL IS A FORGERY -
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AskDNS
askdns JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL _SENDERDOMAIN_ TXT /^v=spf1 .*?\?all/
describe JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL SPF set to ?all
score JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5
askdns JMQ_SPF_ALL _SENDERDOMAIN_ TXT /^v=spf1 .*?\+all/
describe JMQ_SPF_ALL SPF set to +all!
score JMQ_SPF_ALL 0.5
endif
remove those ?'s:
/^v=spf1 .*\?all/
and
/^v=spf1 .*\+all/
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Windows found: (R)emove, (E)rase, (D)elete
