> On Nov 21, 2018, at 8:48 AM, Bill Cole
> <sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
>
> There is no reason for anyone without a commercial presence in the EU or CH
> to be concerned with GDPR.
Except for the private right of action provided in GDPR, and small claims court
in the U.S.
And, for entities that spam enough people "in the EU" (for our
analysis/explanation of that, along with why U.S. companies should comply with
GDPR, see here:
https://www.isipp.com/resources/how-email-marketing-must-comply-with-the-eu-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/
NB: GDPR does not state anywhere that it applies to EU residents or
citizens, only the vague and ambiguous "in the EU") the language in GDPR that
states they will go after anyone, anywhere in the world.
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
Legislative Consultant
CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
Board of Directors, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute
Legal Counsel: The Earth Law Center
California Bar Association
Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee
Colorado Cyber Committee
Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose
Ret. Chair, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
