On Sep 15, 2019, at 1:09 AM, Axb <axb.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/14/19 9:30 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>> I am still getting spammed processes that last for hours or days. When I 
>> kill them, `kill -9` they come back after the load drops. The processes use 
>> 100% of the processor.
>> nobody   72041 100.0  2.2  87264  76940  -  R    10:36      35:28.97 spamd 
>> child (perl)
>> root     52954   0.0  1.9  76992  67124  -  I    13:41       0:01.60 spamd 
>> child (perl)
>> root     55342   0.0  0.2  24904   7828  -  Ss   Sun15       0:06.06 
>> /usr/local/sbin/spamass-milter -f -p /var/run/spamass-milter.sock -u spamd 
>> -r 10 -i 65.121.55.40/29 -i 127.0.0.1 -e covisp.net
>> root     73409   0.0  2.1  84860  75240  -  I    Wed20       0:59.01 spamd 
>> child (perl)
>> root     84607   0.0  1.8  73880  63700  -  Ss   Tue01       0:20.77 
>> /usr/local/bin/perl -T -w /usr/local/bin/spamd -c -H /var/spool/spamd -d -r 
>> /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid
>> The only way to get rid of it is to stop spamd and restart it.
>> Running SA 3.4.2 on FreeBSD 11.3 with no updates pending. I tried updating 
>> perl, but that did not work at all, it appears SA can’t use perl 5.30.
>> I’ve just setup cron to stop/start sa-spamd periodically until I figure out 
>> why this is happening.
>> What is starting spamd as nobody instead of root like the other processes?
> 
> 
> Is this what you're looking for?

I don’t think so, the issue is spamd child processes that keep running for days 
and peg one of the cores.

> https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/spamd.txt
> -m num, --max-children=num        Allow maximum num children
> 
> --min-children=num                Allow minimum num children
> 
> --min-spare=num                   Lower limit for number of spare children
> 
> --max-spare=num                   Upper limit for number of spare children
> 
> --max-conn-per-child=num          Maximum connections accepted by child 
> before it is respawned



-- 
<div id="me"><div id="Dennis Miller>It's just my opinion. I could be
wrong.</div>But I'm not.</div>

Reply via email to