On 5/3/20 1:16 AM, Bill Cole wrote: > On 30 Apr 2020, at 14:59, Tom Williams wrote: > >> Hi! I'm new to this mailing list, but not new to SpamAssassin. I've >> used it on and off for a number years. :) Recently, (within the >> past 6 months or so) I enabled it for email in a shared web hosting >> environment (we host with InMotionHosting). Anyway, due to the volume >> of email traffic the server receives, I see a *lot* of >> 'URIBL_BLOCKED' entries in the SpamAssassin header injected in the >> headers of incoming mail. If our server can't use URIBL to check >> mail, will that have an adverse or negative impact on SpamAssassin's >> ability to detect/identify spam? > > Yes. A quick look at one of the servers I manage shows that about 10% > of the spam identified by SA would not be over the threshold without > the contribution of URIBL rules. > > Thanks! This is the kind of feedback I was most interested in.
Tom
