On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 6:07 AM jdow <j...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> Please Marc, stick to technical merit for your argument. Getting nasty does
> not
> solve technical problems, which we have here. Attacks are not going to solve
> anything. Rational arguments may not. But, they should be made just the same.
> Then the open source developers will go off and do what they (think they)
> want.
> The job is to lead them to thinking they want something different for what
> they
> see as good reasons. Personally I believe the change is a technical failure
> and
> will not provide the social results they seem to desire. They should think
> about it.
>
I would like to add that if this is perceived to cause technical
issues certain members of the community believe outweighs any
perceived non-technical benefits, these members have the right to
check if the current spamassassin license allows for forking. And if
that is the case, they have the right to fork it out.
After all, someone said "A right delayed is a right denied."
> {o.o}
>
> On 20200714 02:57:19, Marc Roos wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> To you and others spouting off, be reminded that this is a publicly
> > archived mailing list and you
> >> will be on the wrong side of history. Consider that when you post.
> >
> > You must be feeling like a king in your little PMC? Who are you to judge
> > whom is on the wrong side of history. No wonder people raise questions
> > here, with someone like you deciding things. I think the PMC should
> > disqualify your vote.
> >
