Whether or not it's the ONLY one it should have been NONE. You claimed
we would not have to change anything for at least a year - as I
understodd it. Certainly you should not have broken existing installations!
I am running 3.4.2, dictated by my OS. I am quite happy running that
version - at least, I was before the speciously argued changed that
broke it.
What about all the other whitelist and blacklist nomenclature in the
(pre-broken) version? I have altered scores for those below. Are they
also broken? Or any other that I may have missed?
priority USER_IN_WHITELIST
priority USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST
priority USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO
priority USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST
priority USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL
priority USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST
priority USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL
priority USER_IN_BLACKLIST
priority USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO
shortcircuit USER_IN_WHITELIST
shortcircuit USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST
shortcircuit USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO
shortcircuit SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST
shortcircuit USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST
shortcircuit USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL
shortcircuit USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST
shortcircuit USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL
shortcircuit USER_IN_BLACKLIST
shortcircuit USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO
shortcircuit SUBJECT_IN_BLACKLIST
