On 2021-04-11 22:43, Steve Dondley wrote:
On 2021-04-11 04:19 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-04-11 22:09, Steve Dondley wrote:

Content analysis details:   (4.4 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
                            [score: 1.0000]
0.5 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
                            [score: 1.0000]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
[52.100.189.222 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             no trust
                            [52.100.189.222 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS          Subject is all capitals
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                            valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                            author's domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                            envelope-from domain
 0.0 UPPERCASE_50_75        message body is 50-75% uppercase

i see its as a local problem

http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/52.100.189.222.html

do you use KAM.cf channel ?

OK, I added KAM.cf to my config. It has now pushed it over 5.0, barely:

Content analysis details:   (5.1 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             no trust
                            [52.100.189.222 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 3.5 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
                            [score: 1.0000]
0.5 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
                            [score: 1.0000]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
                            [52.100.189.222 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 0.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS          Subject is all capitals
-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                            envelope-from domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                            author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                            valid
 0.0 UPPERCASE_50_75        message body is 50-75% uppercase
0.2 KAM_MANYTO Email has more than one To Header or more than 25
                            recipients
0.5 KAM_NUMSUBJECT Subject ends in numbers excluding current years
 0.0 KAM_SHORT              Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL

sorbs dnsbl missing, have you denied sorbs.net results ?, or is spamassassin not testing sorbs.net anymore ?

anyway, you can add more scores to the rule names or create local meta rules to add more scores on the results

just use BAYES_999 in the meta with && rulenames

or simple add more weight to BAYES_999

lets say it scored 15 on that rule name :)

i cant garenti that it have no downside on doing it YMMV

Reply via email to