Dear Loren,
Thank you very much for your email. Based on your message I could deduce
there were earlier messages (which I then read through a web archive).
For some unexplained reason I never received the previous 3 responses to
my email. I hope the university network isn't randomly over-filtering
spam again (we've had those kinds of problems for a while now, it's
quite a problem, we are much more careful about how we mark spam).
Based on what I've read, I agree that this is indeed a bug (or actually
several). I've filed the following bug reports:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7904 (missing body
types, as mentioned by RW)
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7905 (meta tflags=net
tests are ignored)
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7906 (meta
tflags!=net tests are always header tests)
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7907 (better support
for meta tests in autolearning in general, with 2 possible solutions)
Thank you very much to RW and Matus Uhlar for helping me figure out what
code to look at and for al three of you to confirm that this is clearly
a set of bugs.
Feel free to file more bugs if you consider there are more based on my
issue, as well as to give support, write suggestions or submit patches
on the bugs I have already filed.
Kind regards,
Bert Van de Poel
On 10/05/2021 06:41, Loren Wilton wrote:
so you don't have points from body rules.
your mentioned URI_DEOBFU_INSTR is a meta rule:
meta URI_DEOBFU_INSTR __URI_DEOBFU_INSTR && !__MSGID_OK_HOST
so maybe it's not considered.
They are treated as header, or ignored if marked as net.
I think a bug report should be submitted for this.
Either they should be treated split 50/50 as header and body score, or
when the metas are built they shoudl have a "body rule" flag, and that
used to determine where the score goes.
I tried, but for some reason apache decided that I'm evil and blocked
the submission attempt, so someone else can do it.
Loren
