I haven't written many of these with Meta, but wanted to make sure how this works. If the meta FROM_TEST from FROM_TEST_EMAIL && FROM_TEST_IP is false, does that mean the next line score will not be added/executed? In my mind, I feel like (top down logic ) the score will happen all the time.
Also, does this look like the right idea? Thanks!! header FROM_TEST_EMAIL From =~ /user@test\.com/i header FROM_TEST_IP Received =~ /from 1\.2\.3\.4/i meta FROM_TEST from FROM_TEST_EMAIL && FROM_TEST_IP score FROM_TEST -1.0 On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:48 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: > On 28.04.23 11:04, Joey J wrote: > >I have this rule which I thought looked good, but doesn't seem to ever > kick > >in. > > >header FROM_TEST_IP_AND_EMAIL From =~ /sender@sender\.com/i && Received > =~ /from 138\.193\.30\.7/ > > >I was hoping to find the senders email address, then if it's found, see > the > >sending IP, if that matches gives a negative score. > > > >Is there a better way? > > > >Also is there some kind of rule tester you can use where you put a rule, > >put some headers and see what it evaluates? > > you must create two separate rules and a meta rule for that. > > I also recommend using X-Spam-Relays-Trusted pre-paresed pseudo-header: > > https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/4.0.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html > > -- > Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ > Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. > Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. > You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, > then used against you. > -- Thanks! Joey
