On 30.01.24 09:59, joe a wrote:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
While cleaning up recent Ham/Spam, found my "saved SPAM" goes back to
2013.
Why that's over . . . wait, I need to take off my socks . . .
So, how old is "too old". For saved SPAM?
I did retrain on old spam a few times and it was working fine.
Depends on how much mail you have:
0.000 0 7542 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 80869 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 996032 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000 0 1172945918 0 non-token data: oldest atime
so, even old spam mey be fine. You however need much of ham to train
otherwise everything starts looking like spam.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Linux - It's now safe to turn on your computer.
Linux - Teraz mozete pocitac bez obav zapnut.
