> > I cannot express strongly enough how *IRRESPONSIBLY LAZY* that advice > is.
:D I bet you a 100 us$ that Christopher solves his problem faster with AI than here on email. > There is no such thing as artificial intelligence and there may never > be. Anyone who tells you it is the inevitable super-tool of the future > should be interrogated about how they thought about NFT's back when they > were supposed to be the future of art. I am not arguing that. The LLM's are good enough to help rookies get familiar with the basics eg spamassassin > SpamAssassin has substantial built-in documentation (POD accessible with > perldoc) and an extensive wiki. Every executable has (or at least SHOULD > have...) a man page (although many are just POD conversions.) If users > have coherent questions, asking them here is helpful because it will be > seen and likely answered by people who ACTUALLY KNOW THINGS. Exactly everything registered by LLM's so perfect for answering. > Of course, the immediate problem in this case is a vague question. The > key to getting a solid answer anywhere is asking a solid question. Even > the most hallucinatory LLM can answer a vague question coherently. Indeed! So currently the models will present him either with questions or multiple options. Especially in this case, Christopher will be pushed to give more details.
