>-----Original Message----- >From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 8:38 PM >To: List Mail User >Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re[2]: Is Bayes Really Necessary? > > >Hello List, > >Thursday, May 26, 2005, 10:05:26 AM, you wrote: > >LMU> Though nobody seems to have said it exactly this way: It seems >LMU> to be becoming very obvious that the people who say the >have problems >LMU> with Bayes are those who support a diverse group of users >(e.g. ISPs >LMU> and email providers) and those who find it works well, >even with autolearning >LMU> are those with either small numbers of users or users who >are mostly of >LMU> a very specific categorization type (e.g. medical, legal, >technical, or >LMU> just about any homogenous group). > >Sorry -- major email server here, serving several hundred domains, >well over 1k users, all types from techical experts to business people >to newspaper reporters to retailers to pharmacists to people with >professions of various ages. Site-wide Bayes. Everyone has access to >sa-learn via IMAP. Works marvelously. > >Bob Menschel
Yeah but you aren't the typical user/admin :) You have more then a clue on how to care and feed a bayse DB. --Chris
