Heute (12.01.2006/20:04 Uhr) schrieb Matt Kettler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
> The AWL can be poisoned by a slightly clever spammer, but at best this gets > them > a "half off your score" for the real spam. For this reason, I keep it > disabled. > Bayes autolearning can be very useful, but I'd suggest adjusting the ham > learning threshold. The default of 0.5 is too high for my liking and can > sometimes cause problems. how can I change the defaults of learning threshold? I use SA V 3.1.0 > I run mine at -0.01 and have added a bunch of simple > rules with small negative scores (-0.01 to -0.1) such that common business > related ham messages will get autolearned. > That said, several people like Justin Mason run the bayes system on > autolearning > only with the default settings and have no problems. Really most of the sites > I've seen where the autolearner went awry started off with no manual training. > While most of the time this goes OK, sometimes the bayes DB can start off on > the > wrong foot due to some low-scoring spam. It seems that this is the biggest > risk > of the bayes autolearner. -- Viele Gruesse, Kind regards, Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ #277289867 - VoIP: +49 (0) 322 212 044 67 Key ID: 0x1F78066F ---------- Zufalls-Zitat ---------- Die Schwierigkeit liegt darin, daß wir als Menschen nicht nur Probleme lösen, sondern auch Probleme schaffen. (Edward Teller) ---------- Der Text hat nichts mit dem Empfaenger der Mail zu tun ---------- Virus free. Checked by NOD32 Version 1.1363 Build 6612 12.01.2006
