> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 11:07 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: Post your top 10 from sa-stats > > Dallas Engelken wrote: > > Ok, Lets take the following sample data.... > > > > Email: 2766 > > Spam: 975 > > Ham: 1791 > > > > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 7 HTML_MESSAGE 629 22.74 64.51 34.51 > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > TOP HAM RULES FIRED > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 6 HTML_MESSAGE 618 22.34 64.51 34.51 > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > we had 2766 total emails. > > > > for %OFMAIL, > > 629 spam messages hit HTML_MESSAGE which is 629/2766 = 22.74%. > > 618 ham messages hit HTML_MESSAGE which is 618/2766 = 22.34%. > > Oh, I see now. Thanks for clearing that up. > > So the correct interpretation is that 22.74% of mail is "HTML > spam", and 22.34% of mail is "HTML ham". > > Adding the two together, 45.08% of mail matches HTML_MESSAGE > (for this sample data.) >
You got it! :) D
