Here is what I get when I reproduce the email:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.002 tagged_above=-1 required=1.5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
spamassassin -t gives me this:
Content analysis details: (9.1 points, 2.5 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
lines
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
1.6 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see
<http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?81.121.100.79>]
3.9 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[81.121.100.79 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
They are very different!
Where do we go from here?
Thanks again!!
-Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Wetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: Messages Not detected as Spam
Paul Wetter wrote:
For the last week now I have been receiving several very similar
messages that are spam and not being detected as spam. I have done an
sa-learn on every one of them but they still come in not even being
tagged. Is there something wrong with my bayes detection? Is there
any way to log what spamassassin is doing to see if it finds anything?
I call spamassassin's spam checks through amavisd-new which controls a
couple virtual domains.
First step, try running one of them manually through spamassassin -t..
what rule hits do you get? (post the X-Spam-Status SA generates).
Next step, modify amavis to always add an X-Spam-Status header (ie: set
tagged_above to -1000.). Compare the results, or post here along with
the above..
