On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:21:54AM -0700, John D. Hardin wrote: > I think both OPs point is that a 3.1.3 -> 3.1.4 (i.e. minor version > bugfix) upgrade shouldn't suddenly make a bunch of previously-working > rules simply disappear...
This wouldn't make rules disappear. It's informational output, but not a lint error. You can follow the discussion in http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4347 if you want. :) > Does the upgrade do something like change the default local rules > path, such that the dependency rules can no longer be found? Etc. No, the rules would likely have had these issues for a while (I can't really comment on non-official rules), but with 3.1.4 there's now info output showing that there's a problem. (before, people would have had to manually figure out that meta dependencies have issues) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "The random quantum fluctuations of my brain are historical accidents that happen to have decided that the concepts of dynamic scoping and lexical scoping are orthogonal and should remain that way." - Larry Wall
pgpefYDYI2xvo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
