On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Loren Wilton wrote:

> From: Loren Wilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Resent-From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: SpamAssassin Users List <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> Resent-To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:09:37 -0700
> Resent-Date:  Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:11:20 +0100 (BST)
> Subject: Enumerating the robots?
> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--)
> 
> It was mentioned that several people are getting hammered
> by world-wide robot attacks.  I see from the little spam I
> get that there is a new spam sending tool for robots that is
> running a stock spam.  I suspect the traffic is a combination of
> distributing the new spam tool and sending out the new spam.
>
> With all this traffic from robots, lots of people here must be
> getting quite a lot of information in their logs about connections
> from robots.  I wonder if there would be value in a central
> database that attempts to enumerater the robots?


I reject a lot of connections using simple HELO tests etc.
For example:

2006-08-22 14:47:33 H=(138.38.32.20) [85.95.65.33] I=[138.38.32.20]:25 
F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rejected RCPT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Imposters are persona 
non grata.

In this case the connecting IP [85.95.65.33] announced itself as the
IP address [138.38.32.20] of the server to which it was connecting.
The envelope sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
almost certainly means this was an attempt to send a phishing scam.

Other tricks used include connecting IPs announcing themselves as
as one of the email domains handled by the server to which they're
connecting:

2006-08-22 15:00:08 H=(bath.ac.uk) [201.217.19.209] I=[138.38.32.20]:25 
F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rejected RCPT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Charlatan, how can you 
be bath.ac.uk ?

And there seems to be a lot of machines out there that think they're
called "friend".

I'm more than happy to reject stuff using such simple tests[1].  But
placing the connecting IPs in a database is a different matter.  You
might wish to set standards for inclusion.  My "kill 'em all, let
God decide" attitude might not be acceptable to some.

[1] Many such hosts may well be in some of the RBLs I use.  I don't
    know.  These cheap test are run before examining any of the RBLs
    I use.
-- 
Dennis Davis, BUCS, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               Phone: +44 1225 386101

Reply via email to