On Thursday 28 September 2006 1:17 am, Donald Craig wrote:
> And Theo Van Dinter pointed out:
> You're not by chance using the opendns.{com,org} folks for DNS, are you?
>
> Of course.  I'm an idiot.  I switched to OpenDNS a couple of weeks back.
> Time to return from whence I came.  Thank you,
> Don Craig
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> I'm getting matches whenever I have an embedded URL
> on URIBL_AB_SURBL and URIBL_PH_SURBL -
> unless the URL is actually in URIBL_SBL, in which case the
> logic for all the flavors of URIBL_XX_SURBL seems
> to work correctly.  I have verified the
> absence of the incorrectly matching URLs from SURBL
> with lookups in http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi
>
> This is SpamAssassin 3.1.5, all was fine in 3.1.2.
>
> For now I have set both those tests to 0.00.
>
> Don Craig
Yes, OpenDNS definitely caused problems for me also:

Sep  1 21:51:25 localhost spamd[10939]: uridnsbl: bogus rr for 
domain=otwaloow.com, rule=URIBL_XS_SURBL, id=8880 
rr=otwaloow.com.xs.surbl.org. 1 IN A 208.67.219.40 
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm line 
626. 

Theo pointed out the errors of my ways:

> The error is saying that it's looking for a 127/8 result, but it gets
> 208.67.219.40 (which resolves to a *.opendns.com name btw).  So I would
> say that yes, the problems are related to changing your nameservers.


-- 
Chris

Attachment: pgpiCQ7T2K9Ew.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to