> -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:36 AM > To: qqqq > Cc: Matt; Peter H. Lemieux; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Q. about spam directed towards highest MX Record? > > > You have it right. Unfortunately, mail still hits the > lowest priority > > server based on my experience even when the Primary is up > and running.
Or, even better, point it at an unused IP on your network. (don't point it at 127.0.0.1, that will get you blacklisted in the rfc-ignorant invalid mx list) That way, no bandwidth used except for a tcp syn every now and again.
