Ok, if the image spams all have a different hash wouldn't that make the
Hash function built into Fuzzy OCR useless as well? I'm not sure I buy into
that thinking. The hash option in my Fuzzy OCR setup runs pretty well.
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: Christian Recktenwald
To: Bill ; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: New RBL idea regarding image spam
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:00:10AM -0500, Bill wrote:
> Couldn't there be an RBL established ... that
> maintained the hash of known spam images and forego the wordlist
detection?
most image spam contains small differences (some flipped pixels, etc)
so the hash function will return different results.
--
Christian Recktenwald : :
citecs GmbH i.L. : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unternehmensberatung fuer : voice +49 711 601 2090 : Boeblinger Strasse
189
EDV und Telekommunikation : fax +49 711 601 2092 : D-70199 Stuttgart
