Tony Guadagno wrote:
> Ok,
>   I am a little frustrated.  I am missing something and I don't see
> it. 
> 
> All I am trying to do is
> 
> whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> etc
> 
> but it seems that there are no whitelist test running ....why?
> 
> Content analysis details:   (7.6 points, 5.6 required)
> 
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ----------------------
> -------------------------------------------------- 
>  0.0 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
>  0.0 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header
> -0.0 NO_RELAYS              Informational: message was not relayed
> via SMTP 
>  2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP         Missing blank line between message header
> and body 
>  1.3 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header
>  2.0 BAYES_80               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to
>                             95% [score: 0.8387]
>  1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
> -0.0 NO_RECEIVED            Informational: message has no Received
> headers 
>  0.0 NO_HEADERS_MESSAGE     Message appears to be missing most
> RFC-822 headers 
> 
> I am using sa 3.2.2 and for now, just testing using spamassassing.bat
> I have --lint and everything seems ok. 
> 
> 
> why is it not whitelisting!!!

The scores you posted seem to indicate that the message you sent to
spamassassin has no headers.  What does your test message look like and
how did you do the test?

Also, "whitelist_from" is a very bad idea in general.  It can be fooled
VERY easily.  Once you fix the problem and get the whitelist_from
working, you should change it to "whitelist_from_rcvd" or
"whitelist_from_spf", which are much more resistant to spoofing.

-- 
Bowie

Reply via email to