YEP!!!!! that did it
i will have to work around that. thanks VERY MUCH!!!!!! *********************************************** Tony Guadagno Guadagno Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] 585.703.6700 *********************************************** >>> Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/29/2007 12:11 PM >>> Found it. Your test message starts with these two lines: MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=3803 RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> These are not valid header lines, so this messes up the header parsing. If you fix these headers to be formatted properly or do SA parsing before adding these headers, the problem will go away. Bowie Tony Guadagno wrote: > Bowie, > I did not include all the whitelists....here they are...also, do > you see why I am getting all the header issues? > > whitelist_from smtpgw01.fujifilmesys.net > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > *********************************************** > Tony Guadagno > Guadagno Consulting > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 585.703.6700 > *********************************************** > > > > > Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/29/2007 11:27 AM >>> > The test message you included did not contain any of your whitelist > addresses. If you want to test the whitelist, you have to use a > message > that will match. > > Bowie > > Tony Guadagno wrote: > > Bowie, > > thanks for your response. Here is the test message > > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > *********************************************** > > Tony Guadagno > > Guadagno Consulting > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 585.703.6700 > > *********************************************** > > > > > > > Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/29/2007 10:55 AM >>> > > Tony Guadagno wrote: > > > Ok, > > > I am a little frustrated. I am missing something and I don't > > > see it. > > > > > > All I am trying to do is > > > > > > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > etc > > > > > > but it seems that there are no whitelist test running ....why? > > > > > > Content analysis details: (7.6 points, 5.6 required) > > > > > > pts rule name description > > > ---- ---------------------- > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > 0.0 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header > > > 0.0 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header > > > -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not > > > relayed via SMTP > > > 2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP Missing blank line between message > > > header and body > > > 1.3 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header > > > 2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 > > > to 95% [score: 0.8387] > > > 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header > > > -0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no > > > Received headers > > > 0.0 NO_HEADERS_MESSAGE Message appears to be missing most > > > RFC-822 headers > > > > > > I am using sa 3.2.2 and for now, just testing using > > > spamassassing.bat I have --lint and everything seems ok. > > > > > > > > > why is it not whitelisting!!! > > > > The scores you posted seem to indicate that the message you sent to > > spamassassin has no headers. What does your test message look like > > and how did you do the test? > > > > Also, "whitelist_from" is a very bad idea in general. It can be > > fooled VERY easily. Once you fix the problem and get the > > whitelist_from working, you should change it to > > "whitelist_from_rcvd" or "whitelist_from_spf", which are much more > > resistant to spoofing.
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 X-GWTYPE:USER FN:Tony Guadagno EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:[EMAIL PROTECTED] N:Guadagno;Tony END:VCARD
