mouss wrote: > If I understand, "spam" is a generic word. I am also convinced that > "arrest" is a generic word. Now accepting "spam arrest" as a trademark > is beyond me, as is all this trademark and patent stuff...
Yep. We recently had a trademark application rejected by the EU Common Trademark people with the reasoning that it consisted of two words, both of which were generic or common words. /Per Jessen, Zürich