On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 22:10 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:

> Please don't top-post.  It makes it much harder to read.
> 
> Marc Ferguson wrote:
> > Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
> > > just use spamc and feed a message manually, unless you want to
> > > test your MTA, in which case you need to check the manual of your
> > > mta.  You can as well just send a message to yourself using telnet
> > > from your home computer. a properly setup spamfilter will match
> > > XBL, no matter the content of your message.
> >
> > I am a total newb to spamassassin and some network tools you mentioned
> > so I don't know how to do what you suggested.  I looked up spamc and I
> > see it's the client to spamd, but I didn't understand fully what I read.
> 
> By this I assume that you are using "spamassassin" directly and not
> "spamc".  (That's okay.  I use "spamassassin" directly too. :-)  The
> two are almost the same thing in functionality.  In which case you can
> translate that instruction into feed the message into spamassassin.
> 
> You can also tell if spamassassin is working by the presence of X-Spam
> headers in the processed messages.  If the header is there then
> spamassassin is processing the message.  If not then it isn't.
> 
> > Besides testing to see if spamassassin is working I wanted to increase
> > the filters.  I don't know if i'm saying it right.  Mail does go to my
> > junk box but i'd like more mail in my junkbox.  I do not have full
> > control over my mail server.  Thanks.
> 
> One very large lever is the Bayes engine.  But it needs 200 spam
> messages and 200 non-spam messages before it will have enough history
> to add to the scoring.  You can see how many messages have been
> processed using sa-learn like this:
> 
>   sa-learn --dump magic
> 
> Bob
> 
> 

Not top replying is goiing to be a tough thing to get used to.  I did
the magic dump and this is my result.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sa-learn --dump magic
0.000          0          3          0  non-token data: bayes db version
0.000          0       1312          0  non-token data: nspam
0.000          0        693          0  non-token data: nham
0.000          0     112435          0  non-token data: ntokens
0.000          0 1180964576          0  non-token data: oldest atime
0.000          0 1210998882          0  non-token data: newest atime
0.000          0 1210992306          0  non-token data: last journal
sync atime
0.000          0          0          0  non-token data: last expiry
atime
0.000          0          0          0  non-token data: last expire
atime delta
0.000          0          0          0  non-token data: last expire
reduction count
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ 

Marc F.

Reply via email to