On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 14:55 -0500, Ray Jette wrote:
> I created the test message and ran it through both ways. One with PO and
> the other with po. The rule fired on both.
Err, this is bad, isn't it?
What rule *exactly* are you talking about? Copy-n-paste it from the cf
file. What file name does it come from? Are there any other, similar
named rules?
How *exactly* did you run the test? What where the modified lines in the
test message?
> When receiving mail from the outside the rule only fires on PO and not
> po. Is there any reason for this to happen?
You did not restart the SA incorporating daemon. Again. It's still
running with an old config. Did you --lint your configuration?
How *exactly* is SA being called in your mail processing chain? Are you
using spamd, amavis, etc...?
I have provided proof of a rule that works. Your problem is not with
that rule. I'm out, unless we got a detailed description of your
environment, and answers to all questions above.
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
