Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Do train false negatives. It does help Bayes, if you train "FN according to Bayes", that is spam that has been caught, but got a low, ham-ish Bayes score.
It seems that I need to brush up on specifics of SA Bayes; so far I have used only DSPAM from among statistical filters.
Regards, Marcin Krol
