On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 16:01 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 15:13 +0100, Marcin Krol wrote:
Forgot to add... > > No, I just waited until default 200 hams and 200 spams kicked it in. As > > I mentioned elsewhere, I get a weird effect of correct positives, but > > relatively many false negatives from Bayes rules. Do train false negatives. It does help Bayes, if you train "FN according to Bayes", that is spam that has been caught, but got a low, ham-ish Bayes score. > I still recommend initial training, to give Bayes a good kick-start. -- char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}