> On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 15:06 +0000, Justin Mason wrote: > > > actually, Bayes would be a good one to drop. If you also remove AWL, > > and comment out both "loadplugin" lines, you will remove the need to > > load the DB_File database module too. > > > > commenting plugins and removing rulesets is definitely the way to go. > > you may be able to keep some net rules active -- trading long scan > > times and latency for low memory.
On 17.12.08 00:35, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > Why is that? Given the, uhm, quite low specs of that box, scanning a > message will consume a few seconds CPU cycles anyway. Adding net tests, > which don't require CPU but just "add" latency (well, background tasks), > should be less of an issue the longer SA needs anyway. Yes, but since the mail will remain in memory for longer time, there may be more mails in memory at the same time, which means, more memory will be used. > Luis, out of curiosity -- why do you want to run SA on that box anyway? > Atom powered boxes with plenty of RAM are available for 200 bucks. That > box essentially would be bored and running idle, while still having the > resources to add almost whatever you feel like. I agree that such box whould not be used for SA. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
