Re: Spam hitting Bayes_99?

[LuKreme]

On 20-Jan-2009, at 08:04, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:

You should also train low scoring (tagged) spam. Or, even better, train

those identified spam with a "low" Bayes score. Similar for ham.

I thought tagged spam was automatically learned by bayes?

Isn't that what bayes_auto_learn does?

--
Advance and attack! Attack and destroy! Destroy and rejoice!