> On 20-Jan-2009, at 08:04, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > >You should also train low scoring (tagged) spam. Or, even better, train > >those identified spam with a "low" Bayes score. Similar for ham.
On 20.01.09 08:19, LuKreme wrote: > I thought tagged spam was automatically learned by bayes? > > Isn't that what bayes_auto_learn does? Only if you set it up so, and only if it fullfills some expectations, e.g. some minimal score, some minimal score by header checks, some minimal score by body checks... manual training on any FPs/FNs that were not correctly autolearned from is a good idea. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Chernobyl was an Windows 95 beta test site.
