On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 00:25 +0000, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:05:35 +0100 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:

> > Oh, and the text actually is incorrect. Neither has been sent from the
> > USA, though it actually are dial-ups. ;)
> 
> The text is lifted from here:
> http://www.joewein.de/sw/spam-replica-watches.htm

What the... ?!

You are spot on, as it seem. My samples are almost *identical* to that
educational one. The URI is different, as is the unsubscribe php file
name. And the bullet list holds different text.

However, the punch line, the first paragraph, the Christmas reference
and actually almost *any* text *are* identical. Including upper case.
Even the indentation is the same -- the body (without the comment) is
indented 4 chars. Exactly what you get when copying from that page.

WHY would a spammer copy a 4 year old known sample verbatim? Are these
guys really that bored?


Thanks for the link, RW. The similarities and reason to do that are just
plain... mind boggling.


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Reply via email to