Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit : > On 05.04.09 14:18, Jeremy Morton wrote: >> Hmm, not sure why my Spamassassin isn't detecting it as spam then. How >> do I set Spamassassin to give me a full spam analysis header even when >> the message isn't detected as spam? As you can see it just gives me a >> 'X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7'. > > Did you set up ok_locales and ok_languages in your SA config? > That is what mouss meant by last sentence I quoted here ... > >> mouss wrote: >>> Content analysis details: (10.5 points, 5.0 required) >>> >>> pts rule name description >>> ---- ---------------------- >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> 2.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist >>> [URIs: fm.interia.pl] > > This might get to uribl _after_ you received it. You need to have URIBL > plugin allowed for this to hit (I recommend you to do that) >
yes. URIBL is getting more and more effective, as viewed from here. and this view isn't just luck, because I have a few addresses which seem to be "first targets" (I do report the corresponding URIs to uribl, and I encourage others to do so). >>> 0.0 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header >>> 1.0 COUNTRY_CN Relayed via China > > mouss: This is not standard rule. > I know, which is why I "concluded" by only referring to the CHARSET rules, which are standard and static. (I actually don't rely on this rule). >>> 3.2 CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER A foreign language charset used in headers >>> 1.8 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 >>> chars >>> 2.5 MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY MIME character set indicates foreign language >>> 0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with >>> no rDNS >>> >>> if you get your lang settings ok, then the CHARSET rules above would >>> give 5.7 points, which is enough. >
