On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:25 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote:
> Yeh ! You are right ! I was justing thinking in way SareRules say this rule
> is Active .... but you are right ! This RSCV rule cover the same thing.
Given that this rule-set is deprecated since *before* 3.0 already, here
goes some advice I've given a few times already...
Carefully review and monitor any third-party (and maybe even stock)
rule-sets. Do not just blindly use whatever you find.
If you would have read the notes before, you wouldn't be wondering or
using it. Odds are, there likely are some other old, deprecated rule-
sets lingering around.
Oh, and since you pointed out the "Active" status, keep the important
caveat on the main page in mind. With a *very* few exceptions, nothing
SARE is being updated and maintained currently.
> > Not strictly a list of the top 200, but isn't this covered by the more
> > extensive RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET dnsbl test?
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
