OK Guys, I understood ! Thanks for this help.
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de] >> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:48 PM >> >> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 02:39 -0700, Marcelo Galeti wrote: >> > Hello Guys, >> >> Wow, a Nabble user with a real name. :) >> >> > Do you know if are there something like the old 'Top200 SpamCop >> Relays' >> > 70_sc_top200 ? >> >> Not strictly a list of the top 200, but isn't this covered by the more >> extensive RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET dnsbl test? > > As you already pointed out, they are not exactly the same. > > The fact is that 70_sc_top200 seems stuck at Jan 2008 and the sare's index > page (http://www.rulesemporium.com/) says ninjas are busy working on > something else. > > It seems to me 70_sc_top200 is an automatic rule, which tautologically > shouldn't involve any ninja at all in its updating. > > Anybody knows what happened to it? > > Giampaolo > > >> >> >> -- >> char >> *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4" >> ; >> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? >> c<<=1: >> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ >> putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Something-like-the-old-%2270_sc_top200%22---%27Top200-SpamCop-Relays%27-tp23094446p23104247.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.