On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 00:17 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> Hello,
> Although I have such a record
>
> whitelist_from *...@domain.com
>
> It's like someone sends a message with domain.com goes to address spam.
> How to set a higher priority for the white list?
The answer to that would be, to lower the score for USER_IN_WHITELIST
even further. However, I strongly suggest you not blindly do that.
The "priority" (score of the rule in SA terms) is already quite strong,
at -100. So, if despite the whitelist_from the mail ends up being
flagged as spam, there are other even stronger rules triggering. You
should have a close look, which rules that are -- that means, what the
real cause is. And fix that.
We can have a look, if you paste all X-Spam-* headers for such a mail
here.
Also, did you restart spamd (or whatever daemon you are using) after
modifying the conf? Do you use third-party glue like Amavis, which might
frag the mail on its own, rather than SA classifying the mail as spam?
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
