On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 13:24, Steve Freegard <st...@stevefreegard.com> wrote: > Justin Mason wrote: >> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090516-r775436-n/T_EMAILBL_TEST_LEM/detail > > Would be interesting to see if the 5 ham hits really were ham or whether > they were accidentally misclassified and what the e-mail address was.
if you click through the [logs] links on http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090516-r775436-n/T_EMAILBL_TEST_LEM/detail#all , you can see that they're in "dos" and "zmi"'s collections: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090516-r775436-n/T_EMAILBL_TEST_LEM?mclog=ham-net-dos http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090516-r775436-n/T_EMAILBL_TEST_LEM?mclog=ham-net-zmi if you ask them nicely on the dev@ list they may dig up the FPs for you ;) --j.
