> ----- "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" <uh...@fantomas.sk> schrieb: > > you apre probable one of "early recipients" in such cases - the spam > > started spreading, IP was not listed in blacklists, checksums weren't in > > *ZOR or DCC databases. I'm afraid only BAYES and other rules may catch > > that...
On 23.05.09 12:44, peter pilsl wrote: > thnx for your answer, but thats not the problem here. There are mails that > are relayed to my server via MX-backup where another > spamassassin-installation checks for spam also. > In this case the mail is spam-checked by spamassassin twice. And the > mx-backup gives a high spamscore (and performs the network-checks) and my > spamassassin doesnt. Are you sure you did not disable (or, did enable) network checks? Some of them have to be enabled, some need additional software installed (razor, pyzor, dcc)... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Microsoft dick is soft to do no harm
