On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 15:54 -0400, Steeve McCauley wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 09:41:48PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > It woudl have been incredbily perplexing if procmail were running
> > > as an openpkg user since it's not an openpkg package.
> >
> > But spamc is. Not that that really should matter, but there's a link.
> > Any chance it's a setuid executable?
>
> That's it, mystery solved :)
Yay!
> [ste...@oneguycoding .procmail]$ ls -l /openpkg/bin/spamc
> -rwsr-xr-x 1 openpkg-r openpkg 393128 Apr 23 12:27 /openpkg/bin/spamc
>
> Thanks for your help, I was pulling my hair out for a while
> on this one.
No problem. :) And please blame your packager, this is not default. ;)
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
