On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:04:46PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 15:54 -0400, Steeve McCauley wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 09:41:48PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > > > > It woudl have been incredbily perplexing if procmail were running > > > > as an openpkg user since it's not an openpkg package. > > > > > > But spamc is. Not that that really should matter, but there's a link. > > > Any chance it's a setuid executable? > > > > That's it, mystery solved :) > > Yay! > > > [ste...@oneguycoding .procmail]$ ls -l /openpkg/bin/spamc > > -rwsr-xr-x 1 openpkg-r openpkg 393128 Apr 23 12:27 /openpkg/bin/spamc > > > > Thanks for your help, I was pulling my hair out for a while > > on this one. > > No problem. :) And please blame your packager, this is not default. ;)
Done. -- Steeve McCauley ste...@oneguycoding.com :wq http://oneguycoding.com A gift of flower will soon be made to you.
