> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > >> > On Wed, June 24, 2009 13:59, Per Jessen wrote: > >> > >> 3) I wouldn't refer to rfc-ignorant as a blacklist - nobody with half > >> a brain would block email just because of RFC ignorance on the part > >> of the sender. > > > > Why not? I do that and intentionally - I don't like receiving spam > > from companies that don't accept complaints...
On 25.06.09 11:42, Per Jessen wrote: > Why not?? - because you thereby block thousands of perfectly legitimate perfectly incompetent? > and non-spamming companies and individuals who happen to have a > mail-admin who is a bit slow. I wouldn't call not having abuse contact for years "a bit slow" especially for cases I warned the admin. > Using rfc-ignorant for scoring is fine, but not for blocking. I have a policy of requiring postmaster abuse contact, so refusing ignorants it fine. They still can fix their behavior. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "Two words: Windows survives." - Craig Mundie, Microsoft senior strategist "So does syphillis. Good thing we have penicillin." - Matthew Alton
