Quoting LuKreme <krem...@kreme.com>:
On 25-Jun-2009, at 16:01, John Rudd wrote:
People who complain that the PBL is blocking things that aren't spam
kind of don't get the point of the PBL. The PBL's definition means
that it will block non-spam. It should also block a lot of spam, but
the fact that it will block ham is not an indictment of the PBL. It
just means that people who complain about that fact don't understand
the PBL.
If only more people understood this. Thanks for the post John, you
summarized it very well. If anyone ever whines about the PBL again,
please repost.
John Ruud's post needs to be in the faq.
jp
--
Simple compliance is a hacker's best friend
----------------------------------------------------------------
@fferent Security Labs: Isolate/Insulate/Innovate
http://www.afferentsecurity.com
